ng i
1] [i
oar |?
851g
1, Whey
EA
er, litle
Kaspar;
1am Ny I
1CCasions
et head
tteration
tand any
wed then
$0. When
ne onl
meaning
at was a
fer was
. then go
1 accuses
cinled, od
| agent d
te scant
neniol
ad $0 i
fy, fo the
1 danegh
1, wishes
Kaspar Hauser.
173
support, is a letter written by an aged clergyman named Pflaum
to Dr. Julius Meyer, October 16, 1871. It is significant that
Meyer did not see fit to quote this letter in his own book.
The worthy canon writes as follows : “The grass has long been
growing on Kaspar Hauser’s grave, and yet many men, otherwise
sensible (to say nothing of women), fall into the greatest excite-
ment if anyone ventures to say that Kaspar Hauser was an arch-
deceiver and ended his career by suicide. Your father and Hickel
are considered his worst enemies, and they are accused of having
secured a large fortune to themselves through their abuse of him.
How often have I argued until IT was hoarse against such unjust
and absurd statements! I knew your father and Hickel as truly
honourable men—the latter was my dear friend and fellow-
countryman.”
And again, October 23: There are people still living who
believe firmly in Kaspar Hauser, and instead of desiring light
upon the subject, prefer that it should develop into a horribly
scandalous revelation.”
However, he comforts himself with the belief that right-minded
persons are convinced by the testimony of Meyer and Hickel that
Kaspar Hauser was a sly impostor, and that his whole story, his
whole life and being, was a lie. Still, the writer admits that as
often as he talks over the matter with educated men, they say,
“ Please explain how it was possible that this young man, intel-
lectually so undeveloped, could play the part for years without
making any mistake which could betray his falsity? ”
Hickel tried to account for this fact by asserting that Kaspar
Hauser was a practised impostor before he appeared in Nurem-
berg ; but Canon Pflaum thought such a hypothesis could not be
accepted without stronger proof than was offered by the letter
which Kaspar Hauser brought with him, and which was evi-
dently a lie from beginning to end.
Canon Pflaum’s epistle is interesting, chiefly as showing that
nearly forty years after Kaspar Hauser’s death his defenders were
as firm as ever in their belief, and ready to uphold it with all the
old enthusiasm.